SUBSCRIBE

Breaking News on Beverage Technology & Markets

Lower calorie sugar types may not make a difference to health: Rat study

Post a commentBy Will Chu , 20-Jan-2017
Last updated on 20-Jan-2017 at 14:25 GMT2017-01-20T14:25:48Z

In humans, an excessive intake of added sugars has been linked to the development of metabolic disturbances. ©iStock/PPrat
In humans, an excessive intake of added sugars has been linked to the development of metabolic disturbances. ©iStock/PPrat

Switching to a ‘healthier’ low calorie sugar may not lessen the risk of developing health conditions as trials comparing two common sugars found other factors involved in long-term health risks.

Findings gathered from a University of Barcelona study suggest calories contained in sweeteners may not be the only influence.

As well as the type of sugar consumed, there is the notable difference arising from consuming simple sugars dissolved in liquid compared to solid form.

These factors add to the ongoing debate as to whether the cardiovascular and metabolic effects of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) can be attributed to the simple sugars or are simply the consequence of an increase in caloric intake and weight gain.

SSBs are perhaps the prime example of simple sugars contained in liquid form.

These include sodas, colas, fruit punches, lemonade, and other fruit drinks with added sugars.

Compounds of choice used by the food industry to sweeten these beverages include sucrose (in Europe) and high fructose corn syrup (in USA).

Both contain roughly equal amounts of fructose and glucose .

Study parameters

The sugar levy, introduced in a number of European countries, aims to cut down on the amount of added sugar contained in SSBs. A 330ml can of Coca-Cola for instance contains 35g (seven teaspoons) of sugar. ©iStock/piotr_malczyk

In the study, female rats were given a liquid solution of either glucose or fructose (20% weight per volume (w/v)) in addition to their normal diet of solid food for a period of two months.

According to the research team, this period of ingestion in rats was roughly equivalent to 6 years of consumption in humans.

A control group, in which more rats received plain drinking water along with their food supply, was also set up.

After euthanizing the rats, glucose, triglycerides (fat) and cholesterol levels were recorded and compared to the control group.

Results indicated that total caloric intake in glucose-supplemented rats was higher than that of fructose-supplemented rats (1.15-fold).

Despite this, only the fructose group showed a significant increase in final body weight (by 1.1-fold).

Liver weight was increased only by fructose supplementation (by 1.4-fold vs control, and 1.3-fold vs glucose-fed rats), whereas adipose tissue weight was significantly increased in both sugar-supplemented groups (by 5.6-fold in the glucose group and 5.2-fold in the fructose group).

Blood lipid analysis also revealed levels of triglycerides were significantly increased in blood taken from fructose-supplemented rats (by 1.2-fold).

Additional results from the fructose group indicated more markers of vascular disease and liver damage than the glucose group.

These included decreased fat burning in the liver (a factor that can contribute to fatty liver) and impaired relaxation of the aorta, which can affect blood pressure.

High-calorie not guilty?

“Rats supplemented with a glucose solution, resulted in a compensatory response that is even worse compared with fructose supplementation, as liquid intake is higher and comparatively solid food consumption is reduced to a lesser extent,” commented the study’s authors.

“As a result, the total caloric intake is higher in rats receiving glucose than in rats with fructose supplementation.”

Previous suggestions have targeted the high calorie intake that simple sugars provide as the cause of adverse health effects.

However, results here showed that compared with the fructose (lower calorie) group, rats supplemented with liquid glucose (high calorie) exhibited less adverse metabolic and vascular effects.

The researchers thought the elevated adiponectin level and the subsequent enhancement of PPARα and eNOS phosphorylation in glucose-supplemented rats might exert some sort of protective mechanism that was not present in the the fructose group.

Source: American Journal of Physiology -- Heart and Circulatory Physiology.

Published online ahead of print: DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00339.2016

“Type of supplemented simple sugar, not merely calorie intake, determines adverse effects on metabolism and aortic function in female rats.”

Authors: Gemma Sangüesa, Sonali Shaligram, Farjana Akther, Núria Roglans, Juan C Laguna, Roshanak Rahimian, Marta Alegret

Post a comment

Comment title *
Your comment *
Your name *
Your email *

We will not publish your email on the site

I agree to Terms and Conditions

These comments have not been moderated. You are encouraged to participate with comments that are relevant to our news stories. You should not post comments that are abusive, threatening, defamatory, misleading or invasive of privacy. For the full terms and conditions for commenting see clause 7 of our Terms and Conditions ‘Participating in Online Communities’. These terms may be updated from time to time, so please read them before posting a comment. Any comment that violates these terms may be removed in its entirety as we do not edit comments. If you wish to complain about a comment please use the "REPORT ABUSE" button or contact the editors.

Key Industry Events

 

Access all events listing

Our events, Shows & Conferences...