Attorney: First round to POM at the Supreme Court, but don't expect the floodgates to open...

By Elaine Watson contact

- Last updated on GMT

Jeffrey Brown: POM still has to prove its case in the district courts, and it won't be easy
Jeffrey Brown: POM still has to prove its case in the district courts, and it won't be easy

Related tags: Supreme court, Coca-cola

POM Wonderful scored a big win on Thursday after the Supreme Court gave it the green light to sue juice rival Coca-Cola for false advertising. But don't expect the floodgates to open with scores of similar lawsuits, says one attorney.

Jeffrey Brown, a partner in the Chicago office of law firm Michael Best & Friedrich, told FoodNavigator-USA: "POM's case against Coca-Cola​ was originally filed in 2008. It's now 2014, and it's not even over yet.

"Now the case ​[POM alleges Coke misled consumers by marketing a Minute Maid juice comprised almost entirely of apple and grape juice as ‘Pomegranate Blueberry'] will go back to the district courts, where POM will still have to prove its case, and that won't be easy. 

"POM has to prove not just that the label was misleading, but to prove injury, which resulted in damage to POM, so there is still a long way to go here."

These cases are extremely expensive and time consuming

He added: "These cases ​[where competitors sue each other under the Lanham Act alleging false advertising] are extremely expensive and time consuming. And there is always the element of tit for tat. If you sue a rival, they might sue you. 

"Most of them are addressed with letter writing campaigns or resolved through the National Advertising Division (NAD) of the Council of Better Business Bureaus, and I don't really see that changing. This ​[Supreme Court opinion] is good news for POM but I don't see the floodgates opening."

As to the broader implications of the Supreme Court opinion​ on juice labeling in particular, it all depends on whether POM ultimately prevails, which is by no means obvious, he said.

In the meantime, companies should already be thinking about whether their labels are false or misleading in their entirety, aside from whether they are strictly compliant with juice labeling regs in the federal Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act, he said, so if they are already doing that, "this doesn't really change the landscape.​"

Click HERE​ and HERE​ to get more legal reaction to the Supreme Court opinion.

 

Minute Maid Pomegranate Blueberry
The Minute Maid 'Pomegranate Blueberry' juice at the center of this legal spat contains 0.3% pomegranate juice, 0.2% blueberry juice, 0.1% raspberry juice, and 99.4% apple & grape juice

Related news

Related products

show more

Our approach to stevia sustainability

Our approach to stevia sustainability

Cargill | 30-Jul-2020 | Product Presentation

As consumers demand greater clarity around the foods they eat, sustainable production is often a key part of a product's story. Cargill stevia leaf...

Delivering optimal sweetness with stevia

Delivering optimal sweetness with stevia

Cargill | 28-Jul-2020 | Product Presentation

Sugar is high on consumers' radar these days…but for many, artificial sweeteners no longer fit the bill. Plant-based, zero-calorie stevia fills the...

Bestevia® Taste Solutions for Europe: Beverages

Bestevia® Taste Solutions for Europe: Beverages

SweeGen Inc. | 21-Jul-2020 | Product Brochure

Reformulating beverages with less sugar and no artificial sweeteners is key to reaching today’s label conscious consumers. Our Bestevia® Taste Solutions...

Brew with Confidence and Detect Spoilage

Brew with Confidence and Detect Spoilage

Sartorius AG | 30-Jun-2020 | Product Brochure

The art of brewing and the science of microbiology are an interesting and dynamic partnership which has been centuries in the making, one cannot exist...

Related suppliers

Follow us

Products

View more

Webinars