The director general (DG) of the Law Society of Ireland has reportedly said that the Irish government...
|
With orange juice sales sliding in the US, PepsiCo’s Tropicana Trop50 brand is one of the ‘few...
|
SETH GOLDMAN, CO-FOUNDER, SAYS BRAND 'CONTINUES TO INNOVATE'
Seth Goldman, co-founder and ‘TEA-EO’ of entrepreneurial success story Honest Tea, tells BeverageDaily.com that Coke’s ownership has...
|
ANALYST BELIEVES IS 'VERY BAD NEWS' FOR NESPRESSO
Nestlé tells BeverageDaily.com that ‘competition is nothing new’ to Nespresso after bitter rival Mondelez said it would...
|
Coca-Cola Enterprises (CCE) says its performance in the next six to seven weeks is ‘very important’ as...
|
Campaign marks shift from 'saying and showing' to more real actions
A senior Coca-Cola Company executive tells BeverageDaily.com that the company is ‘working hard’ to decide whether it...
|
Smoke and Mirrors
For the moment than, lets change the subject Mr Sacks. Let's talk about the questionable marketing of your products. Your label clearly states that your product is not suited for children, and yet you deliberately market to children with sponsorship of athletes that are children, sponsoring events where the majority of the attendees are children and producing apparel specifically for children as part of your marketing strategy.
So if your product is not suitable for children why do you keep directly marketing to them? You have dodged this question continuously and your moderators on the quarterly calls refuse to hear these questions and have them answered as well. Time to clear the smoke and put away the mirrors and answer some real questions.
Posted by MHL
14 December 2012 | 18h41